Aleichem Sholom

A point of clarification on my last blog entry about SOB (sister of blogger) and DOB (dad of blogger) and the documentary they saw on Sholom Aleichem:

Sholom Aleichem was the great Yiddish writer/playwright’s nom de plume.  It is a Yiddish variant of the Hebrew “shalom aleichem,” meaning “peace be with you”.  The correct response, is “aleichem shalom.”

Shalom Aleichem is also a song for the Sabbath (check out this video): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=72wDlNi3fJs

(Translation: Peace unto you, ministering angels, messengers of the Most High, of the supreme King of kings, the Holy One, blessed be He.  May your coming be in peace angels of peace, messengers of the Most High, of the supreme King of kings, the Holy one, blessed be He. Bless me with peace, angels of peace, messengers of the Most High, of the supreme King of kings, the Holy one, blessed be He.  May your departure be in peace, angels of peace, messengers of the Most High, of the supreme King of kings, the Holy one, blessed be He.)

It is relevant, in some miniscule way, to this blog entry.

Today, SOB took TLP (our son, the little prince) to have lunch with DOB and then see the movie, “Cars2.”  TLP was telling SOB and DOB about his favorite parts of camp and he mentioned that Shabbat services was a Friday high point.  Now, there is a totally irreligious reason for this:  TLP gets an extra snack of grape juice and challah.  SCORE!!!! 

Unfortunately, even though no one even mentioned Sholom Aleichem for almost 7 full days, DOB immediately launched into his off-key rendition of “Shalom Aleichem” in full voice for the, er, um, benefit (?) of all within earshot — other patrons of the diner and assorted vermin hiding to get away from the cacophony.

So, two irreconcilable desires derive from this episode:  One, we all agree never to mention anything about Shabbat ever again in DOB’s presence, even the innocent references made by TLP.  The other, is to see how quickly we can trigger the song in DOB at any time and all the time.  The first option would save our sanity but the second option has a slightly mischievous appeal even though it would be tantamount to mutual assured destruction.

SOB and I are dutiful and loving daughters.  Which do you think we chose?  The latter of course.  And, to make it even crazier, we bet on it.  With each other, we only bet in the millions of dollars so we are always going for broke.  It seems appropriate since we are betting on our sanity and that of DOB.

DOB is coming for dinner tomorrow night.  SOB has to work, so I have the advantage.  I might meet him downstairs so that I trigger it even before he crosses the threshold. I am the evil younger sibling.

But, SOB needn’t worry about transferring assets so quickly.  There will always be new bets, even more cynical and macabre bets, long before the Final Accounting is due.  (And, as I understand, Hell doesn’t take cash or credit cards.)

But until then, hum with me:  Sha-lom a-lei-chem, mal-a-chei ha-sha-reit, mal-a-chei el-yon, mi-me-lech ma-l’chei ha-m’la-chim, ha-ka-dosh ba-ruch hu. . . . ♫

Another Family Dinner

It is always so wonderful when family shares a meal.  The family gathers at 6pm for wine and hors-d’oeuvres (chaseri, or pig food, in Yiddish).  POB (partner of blogger) made a great lentil dish, roasted tomato soup accompanied by green salad and bread, all served cold for a great summer time meal.

Dad, of course, came early.  Not just a little early.  4pm.  A reminder to discuss whether the “Early-Bird Special” was an invention or just putting a name to a syndrome of old age.  But I digress.

Yesterday, Dad and SOB (sister of blogger) saw the movie about Sholom Aleichem, the great Yiddish writer.  So, Dad was waxing philosophic about his mamer loshen (mother tongue), repeating much of the Reform Jewish rationalism for stamping out a “ghetto language”.

My generation thinks very differently about Yiddish. We wish we knew it.  Many of us wish we could have spoken to our grandparents in Yiddish.  We could have had more than broken, basic conversations with them.  We could have learned about our history in one of the most expressive languages of our day.

TLP (our son, the little prince) was excited to learn how to respond to Dad, when he said “vus machster?” [what’s doing?]  TLP said, “Ich ikh bin leyenung” [I’m reading].   It was a great moment.

Still, Dad has to be at peace with the choices he and Mom made and I need to let him have that peace. But it was a grueling 1:45 hours until SOB and HOSOB (husband of SOB) showed up (they know that Dad comes early).  Dad continued to talk about Yiddish and Sholom Aleichem and then started singing “Sholom Aleichem”.  SOB shut that down in record time.  She came over to tell me that he kept singing that in full voice at lunch after seeing the movie.  Somethings should stay in synagogue.  That hallel is one of them.

By the time we exhausted ourselves and the topic, Cousin Gentle and CB (Cousin Birder) arrived.  The full complement.

As always, the conversation ranged in topics and sentiments.  Dad worried that we had chocolate-covered peanuts on the table — AS IF we would have anything on the table to which anyone is allergic, much less have them in the house if OUR SON, TLP, were allergic.  (Dad, do you know me?)  But I let that roll off me.  I counted backwards from ten multiple times.  We started talking about politics, always good for the heart rate.  Cousin Gentle worried that John Boehner was having a deleterious effect on my health.   Actually, I was still gobsmacked that my father would think I would put poison on my table.  Cousin Gentle tried to share some of his Buddhist enlightenment.  I tried to be receptive, all the while repeating, “Dad is almost 91 years old.  At least he still worries about other people, even if his comments suggest that his daughter could be the headline story of New York Post edition.”

Unfortunately, Cousin Gentle thought he might have offended me.  He called after dinner to make sure all was ok.  It seemed time to reiterate the rules of Sunday night dinner:

Premise:

It is so wonderful when family gathers.

Sacred Rules:

  1. You can say anything at our table if said with a good heart.
  2. No holds barred.
  3. Everyone has to be able to kiss and say I love you at the end of the night.

Corollaries and Commentary:

  • You can be:
    •  critical (did HOSOB really say something critical about marriage when he married SOB?),
    • questioning (to wit, Dad’s thinking we would put peanuts on the table if someone were allergic),
    • fun-loving (CB’s teasing TLP), and/or
    • torturing (ok, that’s all me)

with impunity.

  • If you do any three out of four in the same sentence, we’ll give you a door-prize.

To review:

Come with your love, your opinions (except Dad) and your insights. Oh, and your appetite.

 

Sunday Morning in the City

I am drinking coffee, sitting on the window seat in my kitchen, looking out our neighbor’s backyard trees and listening to someone practicing the flute.  The flutist is very good and the music is soothing.  When the flutist takes a break, the birds call to each other.  A little bit of peace and tranquility in a bustling city.  POB (partner of blogger) is showering after the gym and TLP (our son, the little prince) is playing in his room after cuddling and rough-housing with me.

TLP is tired from yesterday’s adventure.  Cousin Gentle took him to a train museum in Connecticut.  They are both fascinated by trains (as only boys — young and old — can be) and they rode on an old coach, played inside an antique caboose, went round the turntable on an antique train car.  These were some of the many awesome things at the museum for train aficionados.  They had quite an adventure coming back — a missed bus, and hitchhiking (ok with the nice lady from the museum) to another town to get a different connection to another train that would bring them home.

I am glad that I didn’t know about the “lift from the kind lady from the museum” until after they were safely on the train bound for New York City.  Of course, I was mildly hysterical just having the knowledge that it happened.  Who am I kidding?  I was ready to send a helicopter and airlift them to safety.  POB talked me off the ledge.  All I know is that I kissed TLP at 10:30am and didn’t kiss him again until 8:00pm.  And at some point during that time, he was depending on the kindness of strangers.  (And we all know how that strategy worked out for Blanche DuBois (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blanche_DuBois).)

TLP and Cousin Gentle arrived and we fed them.  They (and we) relaxed, luxuriating in the safety of their being home and having the freedom to give into the fatigue of a long, exciting, stressful and successful trip.

And, having my family back in one piece, under the same roof, makes the tranquility of this morning even more glorious.

If I had my druthers

My mother, z”l, used to say, “If I had my druthers, I would . . . .”

Druthers.

druth·ers

noun Informal .

one’s own way, choice, or preference: If I had my druthers, I’d dance all night.
Origin:
1870–75;  plural of druther,  ( I, you,  etc.) ‘d rather  (contraction of would rather )

Druthers. 

I imagined a box of secret desires that was kept far away from desiring souls.  Like a Pandora’s box of hedonist or materialistic desires.

Every now and again, I say, almost absent-mindedly, “if I had my druthers, I would . . . ”

and POB (partner of blogger), interjects:

“I have your druthers and they are happy not wanting what you say.”

“Can I speak to my druthers?”

“No.”

“Can I visit my druthers?”

“No.”

“Are they happy?” I ask with some exasperation.

“Yes, very.  And they wouldn’t recognize you.”

So my “druthers” have become “POBruthers”.

I am good with that. That is what 10+ years together means.  I trust POB with my druthers.

Be gentle and kind with them, promise?

I was unfriended

The danger of Facebook is that someone can unfriend you.  Or defriend you, I am not sure.

I was hurt.  I was confused. No explanation.  Just  — one day — IFOB (Italian friend of blogger) was not among my friends.  And this, after POB (partner of blogger) showed up to make sure that I was not swooning over his elegance and grace in a moment of heterosexual weakness.  Indeed, IFOB is handsome, charming and so very intelligent and well-read.  But I don’t have moments of heterosexual weakness; I am for my beloved POB and she is for me.  IFOB is a good catch for those of you straight women out there who are single.  (Just FYI.)

Being the straightforward person that I am, I emailed IFOB and asked, “Did you unfriend me?”  He did.  He was angry that I was ambivalent about the equality in marriage legislation.  I should be happy.  In truth, you have to stand in my shoes to understand. When you are discriminated against, it is hard to be thankful when people realize that they ought to stop discriminating.

Of course, I am happy.  And, I am grateful to those who championed the cause.  Mostly, I am happy because I have POB and, with TLP (the little prince), we are a family.  And, love and family cannot be legislated.

POB and I were planning a ceremony before the legislation seemed possible.  Now, it will be a marriage.

IFOB: next time, talk to me if you have an issue with something.  After all, we seem to navigate being political opposites.  Besides, if you are not my friend (forget FB, just generally), you can’t come to the wedding (in 2012).

The times they are a’changing

I always knew I was gay.  People often ask, “how could you know before you were ever with a woman?”  “The same way you always knew you were straight,” I say.  But the truth is that kids don’t think in terms of gay or straight.  They are who they are.  So, I knew as much that I was gay as straight kids knew they were straight.  Labels didn’t apply yet.  It only became an issue in the teenage years and beyond.  I desperately tried to be like everyone else, to the point of going overboard.

In the 1970s-90s, it was something to be hidden if I wanted to be a successful lawyer, if I wanted to fit in, if I wanted to get into the right social and professional crowds.  By the late 1990s, the gulf between who I was and who I pretended to be was wider than the San Andreas fault (gee, I hope that the fault line is wide, or I bungled this analogy).  I was tired of the schism, and so tired of the inevitable lies that somehow never fooled anyone, that I was willing to give up some measure of “success” and “acceptance” for peace of mind and peace of being.  That’s when the journey toward self-acceptance and family acceptance began.  A long, winding road, filled with pot holes, and yet, at various critical points, surrounded by warmth and beauty.

Today, the Ninth Circuit ruled that the military must end “don’t ask, don’t tell”.  Last week, New York legalized same-sex marriage.  A recent poll reported that more people in the country support gay marriage than not.

Still, I am not equal in the United States of America, the beacon of liberty to all nations.  But I am closer to equal than ever before.

I just hope that there comes a time when people wonder why there ever was a need to fight for equality — for anyone, anywhere.

Not Least Enough

I came up with a family crest, based on how lazy SOB (sister of blogger) and I are (http://40andoverblog.com/?p=3772).

You would think that it would satisfy her.  Nope.  “Nos operor minimus nos can operor” is too long.  Lop off the first “nos operor,” SOB says.  So now it translates to: ” [add apostrophe] least we can do”.  The moral equivalent of typing “K” when you mean “okay”.

I guess it IS in keeping with how we run our lives.  And it is the least I can do to make SOB happy.  And we all know what we do:  THE LEAST WE CAN DO.

[Sigh]

nos operor minimus nos can operor

We are grandchildren of immigrants to this country.  We derive from the huddled masses, whose very existences, let alone birth dates, were never recorded in official records.  We have no family crest.  No motto of our lineage.

In our second generation of natural born Americans, we have thrown around mottoes that might define our family’s communal sensibilities.  For a while, we imagined a family crest that would match our intrusiveness, lovable brusqueness that is meant to show love.  SOB (sister of blogger) and I imagined with a white picket fence and an “X” through it.  It would signify, “no boundaries”.

But it is hard to figure out how all that fits on a pinkie ring, which is apparently where the family crest goes, if you are a family crest kind of family.

As time goes by, I have determined that we are not so much intrusive (yet lovable) as we are lazy.  We give new meaning to the usual response to the sentiment, “you shouldn’t have!!”  In fact, we DO do the least we can do.

When SOB brings dessert to top off a three-course Sunday night dinner at our house, she says, “it’s the least we could do.”  And I respond, “yes, yes, it is.”  She is gratified that she exceeded the low bar we set for each other.  And since she has exceeded the bar, she can do a victory lap around the apartment and bend her head to receive her Olympic medal.

Our new motto: nos operor minimus nos can operor

We do the least we can do.

I will come up with some crest designs in future blogs.

Happy Anniversary, POB

POB (partner of blogger) and I have an anniversary of sorts — when I told her that I loved her and wanted to spend our lives together and she teared up and said “grow old with me, the best is yet to be”.  As an aside, I love the fact that POB is so literary.  Intelligence and a true liberal arts education are aphrodisiacs.

Soon, we will have to re-start the clock, after our wedding next year, because we will have a wedding anniversary.  Maybe we can grandfather these 10+ years, especially since our son will be almost 10 on our wedding date.  And I know our mothers, z”l, would not want his having to explain the 10+ years of L-I-S (living in sin).  Of course, for a large part of the population of this country, our wedding won’t solve the issue, but it is too exhausting to parse those views.

Back to POB.  We have been through so much together — deaths of our mothers, buying a home, having a family, developmental issues with our son, job losses, job changes, economic reversals — and some things have been harder than others for us to navigate.  In fact, sometimes it was nearly impossible to see a way through together.  Love abides; happiness on a day-to-day?  Not always.  But if the love is strong, you figure it out.

I love POB more today than ever before.  She becomes more beautiful each day, in her heart, in her body and in her smile.

Sometimes I imagine the last decade-plus as our skipping down a country road together, having not noticed the “Fallen Rock Zone” sign.  We have held hands as we dodged the boulders together, some more successfully than others.

Happy anniversary, POB.  I love you.

~ Blogger.