For Serious News, Turn on Comedy Central

Last night, Jon Stewart skewered CNN on its coverage of the health care debate.  I love Jon Stewart because he points to the idiocy of the 24 hour news cycle and the schnews (schmooze plus news) or newsertainment that passes for pertinent information about our cities, our country and the world. 

All the networks do is talk about finding out information, but they don’t really.  They ask us what we think and then read from the Twitter responses.  Fact-checking Saturday Night Live skits and not fact-checking what the politicians are saying is sheer idiocy.  Spending more time on whether SNL is a bellwhether for Obama than the issues is a disservice to viewers.

Other than Jon Stewart and Bloomberg News, I don’t know where else on TV to get pertinent information.  If I want comfort TV, I watch Rachel Maddow, because I agree with her views.  But for cold, hard, factual news . . . Comedy Central?  What an irony.

David Letterman, Senator Ensign, Roman Polanski

There are no parallels among these men.

David Letterman did get out in front of the “scandal”. That was smart media.  As long as the women with whom he was intimate were consenting adults — that means without fear for their jobs or career advancement — then it is just another philandering person.  What makes it news is that he is a TV star.  What is sad is that sexual harassment happens everyday and there is no famous star to blackmail to make it stop.  David Letterman has a lot of heartache ahead of him.  But he doesn’t need to apologize to me.

Conversely, Senator Ensign needs to apologize to his voters because he is a fraud — he is not the “family values” candidate that his constituency elected and he broke the public trust in the cover-up. His extra-marital affair was not criminal or actionable — consenting adults without any specter (so far) of harassment in the workplace.

Roman Polanski is, based on the information available, a scoundrel and a sexual predator.  A thirteen year-old is a child and is not capable of consent in sexual circumstances.  Justice delayed is justice denied.  Lock him up and throw away the key.

Let’s not lump these men and their actions together.  None is a shining star, but in only one case was there a sexual criminal.  In another, it was the cover-up that is criminal.  The third, well, unless we hear more, is just disappointing and ooky.

There is one guy, whose handle is TheFlaCracker on Twitter, who refers to all Libiots (liberal idiots) as defending Roman Polanski.  That’s unfair.  I am a G-d damn Democrat and liberal and a Hillary-lover.  I am proud of it.  But, child abuse is not a liberal or conservative issue.  It is solely about our expectations and demands for the safety of society’s and our children.

The true measure of our society is how we treat the children others have “cast off”and those who abuse them.

Fair and balanced disagreement

The play-by-play of my review of the Senate bill and my back-and-forth with Mr. Rightcommentary on twitter.  He and I are at odds because, I surmise, we fundamentally disagree on the issue of whether health care is a right or a privilege.  That is a FAIR disagreement.  His theory is based on systemic forces and not a smoking gun in the legislation.  That is also fair.  I can respectfully disagree with him.

Tweets:

  1. I’m on p.104/615 of Senate bill & only controversial provision is feds will give grants to states to provide low cost insurance alternative. 
  2. Sarah P: I’m reading the bills & no death panels so far
  3. the bills don’t create nationalized medicine either. i get to keep my insurance & coverage will be better.
  4. tax is only on certain persons who don’t buy or provide insurance for workers. many exceptions though. Better than use my taxpayer $$ from mobile web
  5. credits for employers who pay full premium; fed grant for under-served communities
  6. p.225 of senate bill tries to set standards of acceptable practice – not as death panel but safe harbor against spurious litigation
  7. oh, wait — p.301 talks about education on medical decision-making btwn patient. MD, family — still no death panels.
  8.  @rightcommentary — i am reading the bills — senate first . what page of HR bill does it say public op for all?
  9. @rightcommentary: really, please point to the page in HR bill. I am reading now.
  10. rightcommentary@40andoverblog The requirements of page 15 as i recall where it sets up what is a “qualified plan” combined with the reqs re: old policies
  11. @rightcommentary: I am reading H.R. 3200. Tell me where the offensive provisions are. 
  12. rightcommentary@40andoverblog it’s just too hard to do in 140 chars. from web in reply to 40andoverblog
  13. rightcommentary@40andoverblog email me an email account at[DELETED] and I’ll give you my theory on how it might work…
  14. @rightcommentary just give me the section references in a few tweets. or you can comment on http://40andoverblog.com
  15. @rightcommentary: creating a floor for basic coverage is not = nationalized medicine. from mobile web
  16. @rightcommentary: with coops instead of a govt-run program, are you ok with the legislation?
  17. rightcommentary no. I’m not. Pretty much anything Washington wants to do other than void the 1973 HMO Act – I’m against.@40andoverblog 

 

end of twitter conversation

Why I love twitter

It is a good thing I am more or less anonymous because no one I know would believe me when I say that I love twitter.  Let’s set some ground rules: there are inane tweets and spam tweets and creep tweets.  But there are moments when it is a social support system.  A few days ago, a mother with a young child tweet that she was feeling as if she had nothing left to give her child — she was worn out  and out of patience.  I tweeted her to give her support and tell her that every parent reaches that point many times in the first few years and it gets better.  I also told her that people who make it look easy are lying.  Others tweeted their support.  Real time support for a true (and virtual) stranger who was overwhelmed and needed a reality check.

She tweeted her thanks.  That a few words from me helped a stranger made my day.  And I am grateful.

Ah, sweet tweets.

Thought for today, July 7, 2009: Twit?

If someone over 40 uses the word, “twit” to mean a jerk or twerp, will a person under 40 have any idea what that means and is there a new definition of “twit” in the Age of Twitter?